Beautyand the Beast is a 2017 American musical romantic fantasy film directed by Bill Condon from a screenplay by Stephen Chbosky and Evan Spiliotopoulos.Co-produced by Walt Disney Pictures and Mandeville Films, the film is a live action adaptation of Disney's 1991 animated film of the same name, itself an adaptation of Jeanne-Marie Leprince de Beaumont's 1756 version of the fairy tale. menx27sdigital sports. The 2017 Beauty and the Beast live-action film, starring Emma Watson as Belle, was something out of a Tumblr committee in terms of casting and desire to fill in all the gaps of the original film. 2017. 3. 10. · Track 16 on. "Beauty and the Beast" is a song written by lyricist Howard Ashman and composer Alan Menken for the Disney animated feature film Beauty and the 123Moviesor 123movieshub was a system of file streaming sites working from Vietnam, which enabled clients to watch films for free. The 123Movies network is still active via clone sites. 123Movies is a good alternate for Beauty and the Beast 2017 Online Movie Beauty and the Beast 2017rs, It provides best and latest online movies, TV series, episodes, and anime etc. . File Credits Trailers [3] Image gallery [22] Plugin not supported. where to watch Original title Beauty and the Beast Year 2017 Running time 123 min. Country United States Director Screenwriter Cast Music Cinematography Producer Genre Romance. Musical. Fantasy Fairy Tales / Fables. Remake Movie Groups Disney's Beauty and the Beast Disney Princess Walt Disney Classics Remakes Jeanne-Marie Leprince de Beaumont Adaptations Synopsis Belle Emma Watson lives in a small town in France with her loving father, Maurice Kevin Kline. He leaves on a trip to the market and when his horse comes back without him, Belle goes looking for him. The horse leads her to an enchanted castle, where Belle finds Maurice imprisoned in a tower by The Beast Dan Stevens. She offers herself as a prisoner in exchange for her father's release. The Beast was once a vain, arrogant and handsome prince until an Enchantress cast a spell on him. The Enchantress leaves a rose in a glass case, telling him that when the last petal falls, if he has not found someone to love him, he'll remain a Beast forever, and his servants will become inanimate objects without personalities. Belle finds to her amazement that the household objects in the castle are alive, and can talk. They wonder if she's "the one" and tell her the Beast is not as terrible as he appears. She slowly gets to know his softer side, just as the townsfolk are preparing to rescue her. Rankings Position 150 Best Remakes in the history of film Awards 2017 Academy Awards Nominated for Best Production Design & Costume Design 2017 BAFTA Awards Nominated for Best Production Design & Best Costume Design 2017 Critics Choice Awards 4 Nominations including Best Art Direction & Costume 2017 Satellite Awards Nominated for Best Costume Design 2017 Chicago Film Critics Awards Nominated for Best Art Direction Critics' reviews Show 3 more reviews Movie Soulmates' ratings Register so you can access movie recommendations tailored to your movie taste. Friends' ratings Register so you can check out ratings by your friends, family members, and like-minded members of the FA community. Ranking Lists Position 39 My Top 10 Movies from 2017 105 48 My Favorite Remakes 15 77 My Favorite Musicals 44 Is the synopsis/plot summary missing? Do you want to report a spoiler, error or omission? Please send us a message. If you are not a registered user please send us an email to [email protected] All copyrighted material movie posters, DVD covers, stills, trailers and trademarks belong to their respective producers and/or distributors. For US ratings information please visit User history 2017 Bill Condon Beauty and the Beast streaming where to watch online?Currently you are able to watch "Beauty and the Beast" streaming on Disney Plus, DIRECTV. It is also possible to buy "Beauty and the Beast" on Microsoft Store, AMC on Demand, Apple TV, Amazon Video, Google Play Movies, YouTube, Vudu, Redbox, DIRECTV as download or rent it on Amazon Video, Apple TV, Google Play Movies, YouTube, Vudu, Microsoft Store, Redbox, DIRECTV, Spectrum On Demand online. Notícias Vídeos Créditos Críticas dos usuários Críticas da imprensa Críticas do AdoroCinema Filmes online Usuários 4,3 3223 notas e 132 críticas Avaliar verEscrever minha crítica Sinopse Não recomendado para menores de 10 anos Em A Bela e a Fera, moradora de uma pequena aldeia francesa, Bela Emma Watson tem o pai capturado pela Fera Dan Stevens e decide entregar sua vida ao estranho ser em troca da liberdade dele. No castelo, ela conhece objetos mágicos e descobre que a Fera é, na verdade, um príncipe que precisa de amor para voltar à forma humana. Assista ao filme Assistir Adrenalina Pura Por assinatura Assistir Veja todas as opções de streaming Críticas AdoroCinema Desde que a Disney resolveu adaptar suas consagradas animações em versões live-action, o estúdio do Mickey tem variado entre apresentar cópias fiéis Cinderela, Mogli e verdadeiras revoluções com os personagens Malévola, Meu Amigo, O Dragão. Por mais que este novo A Bela e a Fera esteja mais próximo da primeira opção, chama a atenção o quanto os roteiristas Stephen Chbosky e Evan Spiliotopoulos ampliaram a história conhecida, não apenas explicando certas pontas soltas como trazendo material inédito. Este, no fim das contas, é um dos destaques do novo filme - mas não o único. Extremamente luxuoso, A Bela e a Fera de imediato salta aos olhos graças ao requinte na direção de arte e figurinos. Se por um lado há o nítido esforço em recriar a ambientação do filme de 1991 - a primeira animação indicada ao Oscar de melhor filme, é sempre bom lembrar -, por outro o diretor Bill Condon & cia en Ler a crítica Trailer 203 200 132 130 116 225 8 trailers Entrevistas, making-of e cenas 8 videos Últimas notícias 234 Notícias e Matérias Especiais Elenco Ficha completa Comentários do leitor eles gostaramAs melhores e mais úteis crítica Sensacional, uma das melhores remakes de animação sai do cinema emocionado, absurdamente lindo, insensibilidade de quem reclama do musical, lindo demais. A Bela e a Fera, este filme é a prova de que é possível sim fazer um bom remake, assim como Cinderela e Mogli, a versão em live-action de a Bela e a Fera faz jus ao original. O filme conta a história de Bela Emma Watson, uma moradora de uma pequena aldeia francesa que tem o pai capturado pela Fera Dan Stevens e decide entregar sua vida ao estranho ser em troca da liberdade dele. No castelo, ela conhece objetos mágicos e descobre que a ... Leia Mais "A bela e a fera" é um bom musical, uma ótima adaptação, com muitos acertos, mas também com alguns erros. Com um roteiro vindo da animação de 91, temos algumas mudanças para pior, como tentar criar um suspense em cima da mãe da bela, e resolver esse mistério numa cena que foge completamente do ritmo do filme, tal mistério não precisaria existir ou poderia ser resolvido em 2 min, pois tal trama é criada para o desenvolvimento do ... Leia Mais Eu gostaria de encontrar os adjetivos para resumir o que acabei de assistir no cinema. Perfeito, mágico, nostálgico e emocionante seriam as principais palavras. Confesso que não era um expert sobre a história de "A Bela e a Fera", sequer tinha assistido algo. O mais próximo que cheguei foi fazer uma festa temática. A sala do cinema estava repleta de pessoas. Tinha algumas crianças, idosos, adultos e muitos jovens. Talvez a maioria quisesse ... Leia Mais 132 Comentários do leitor Fotos 36 Fotos Curiosidades das filmagens Troca-troca Emma Watson seria a Bela em Beauty, filme da Warner, mas deixou o projeto para viver a personagem neste longa da Disney. Escolha difícil Enquanto Ryan Gosling recusou o papel de Fera para fazer La La Land Cantando Estações 2016, Emma Watson desistiu de viver Mia no mesmo filme para ser a Bela do live-action da Disney. E se não fosse musical? Nas primeiras conversas entre o diretor Bill Condon e os representantes da Disney sobre a nova adaptação de A Bela e a Fera 1991, a companhia não tinha certeza se o live-action seria um musical. Condon, por sua vez, achou que seria uma loucura investir na produção sem aproveitar as músicas do filme original. curiosidades Detalhes técnicos Nacionalidade EUA Distribuidor Walt Disney Pictures Ano de produção 2017 Tipo de filme longa-metragem Curiosidades 38 curiosidades Orçamento 160 000 000 $ Idiomas Inglês Formato de produção - Cor Colorido Formato de áudio - Formato de projeção - Número Visa - Se você gosta desse filme, talvez você também goste de... Mais filmes Melhores filmes do ano 2017, Melhores filmes Fantasia, Melhores filmes de Fantasia de 2017. Comentários You could say that the notion of turning beloved stories and characters into brands was invented by Walt Disney. He built his empire on the image of Mickey Mouse who made his debut in 1928, but Disney really patented the brand concept in 1955, with the launch of Disneyland, where kids could see old familiar characters — Mickey! Snow White! — in a completely different context, which made them new. Twenty-three years ago, the Broadway version of “Beauty and the Beast” followed three years later by the Broadway version of “The Lion King” introduced a different form of re-branding the stage-musical-based-on-an-animated-feature. Now the studio is introducing a cinematic cousin to that form with the deluxe new movie version of “Beauty and the Beast,” a $160 million live-action re-imagining of the 1991 Disney animated classic. It’s a lovingly crafted movie, and in many ways a good one, but before that it’s an enraptured piece of old-is-new nostalgia. There’s a lot riding on “Beauty and the Beast.” Given its sheer novelty value the live-action “Cinderella” released by Disney in 2015 wasn’t really cued to the 1950 cartoon version, the picture seems destined to score decisively at the box office. But the larger question hanging over it is How major — how paradigm-shifting — can this new form be? Is it a fad or a revolution? Disney already has a live-action “Lion King” in the works, but it remains to be seen whether transforming animated features into dramas with sets and actors can be an inspired, or essential, format for the future. Going into “Beauty and the Beast,” the sheer curiosity factor exerts a uniquely intense lure. Is the movie as transporting and witty a romantic fantasy as the animated original? Does it fall crucially short? Or is it in some ways better? The answer, at different points in the film, is yes to all three, but the bottom line is this The new “Beauty and the Beast” is a touching, eminently watchable, at times slightly awkward experience that justifies its existence yet never totally convinces you it’s a movie the world was waiting for. A good animated fairy tale is, of course, more than just a movie — it’s a whole universe. The form was invented by Disney eighty years ago, with “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs” 1937, a film I still think has never been surpassed, and when you watch something as transporting as “Snow White” — or “Bambi,” or “Toy Story,” or “Beauty and the Beast” — every gesture and background and choreographed flourish, from the facial expressions to the drip-drop of water, flows together with a poetic unity. That’s the catchy miracle of great animation. When you watch the new “Beauty and the Beast,” you’re in a prosaic universe of dark and stormy sets, one that looks a lot like other stagy films you’ve seen. The visual design, especially in the Beast’s majestic curlicued castle, is gentrified gothic — Tim Burton de-quirked. At the beginning, when Belle Emma Watson walks out of her house and wanders through the village singing “Belle,” that lovely lyrical meet-the-day ode that mingles optimism with a yearning for something more, the shots and beats are all in place, the spirit is there, you can see within 15 seconds that Emma Watson has the perfect perky soulfulness to bring your dream of Belle to life — and still, the number feels like something out of one of those overly bustling big-screen musicals from the late ’60s that helped to bury the studio system. It’s not that the director, Bill Condon “Dreamgirls,” “The Twilight Saga”, does anything too clunky or square. It’s that the material loses its slapstick spryness when it’s not animated. The sequence isn’t bad, it’s just…standard. That’s true of most of the first part of the movie, right up until the point when Belle rescues her kindly inventor father, Maurice Kevin Kline, from the Beast’s castle — where he’s being held prisoner for having assaulted a flower — by trading places with him. Belle, a wistful bookworm, is the odd girl out in her village, and she has already brushed off several encounters with Gaston Luke Evans, the duplicitous hunk who became a new Disney archetype in “Frozen,” etc. the handsome, big-chinned, icky monomaniacal two-faced suitor. On first meeting, however, the Beast seems nearly as dark. He’s a prince who was cursed and turned into a monster for having no love in him, and the best thing about the movie — as well as its biggest divergence from the animated version — is that he’s a strikingly downbeat character, a petulant and morose romantic trapped in a body that makes him feel nothing less than doomed. He’s played by Dan Stevens, a British actor who out of makeup looks like a bland version of Ryan Gosling, but the makeup and effects artists have done an extraordinary job of transforming him into a hairy hulking figure with ram horns, the face of a saddened lion having an existential meltdown, and the voice of Darth Vader channeling Hugh Grant. Visually, the characterization makes a nod to the scowling-eyed Beast from Jean Cocteau’s immortal “Beauty and the Beast” 1946, but he also comes off as a kind of royal version of the Elephant Man a melancholy freak trapped in solitude. I loved that for a good long while, he’s a bit of a hard-ass, a man-creature who doesn’t dare to think that Belle could love him. But then, under her gaze, he begins to soften, and his transformation is touching in a more adult way than it was in the animated version. The romance there was benign; here, it’s alive with forlorn longing. Which is to say, the new “Beauty and the Beast” is not as kid-friendly a movie. It tries to be in certain sequences, notably those featuring Lumière the candelabra voiced by Ewan McGregor, Cogsworth the pendulum clock Ian McKellen, and Garderobe the wardrobe Audra McDonald — all of whom are basically tactile, live-action animated characters. The “Be Our Guest” musical number scrupulously revives the dancing-plate surreal exuberance of the original, but there the frenetic nuttiness was exquisite. Here it tips between exhilarating and exhausting, because you can feel the special-effects heavy lifting that went into it. I keep comparing “Beauty and the Beast” to the animated version, which raises a question Is that what we’re supposed to be doing? Or should the film simply stand on its own? The movie wants to have it both ways, but then, that’s the contradictory metaphysic of reboot culture We’re drawn in to see the old thing…but we want it to be new. The live-action “Beauty and the Beast” is different enough, and certainly, if you’ve never experienced the cartoon, it’s strong enough to stand on its own. Josh Gad, incidentally, plays Gaston’s worshipful stooge Le Fou as maximally silly and fawning, but I must have missed the memo where that spells “gay.” Yet it’s not really that simple, is it? The larger fantasy promoted by a movie like this one is that we’ll somehow see an animated feature “come to life.” And that may be a dream of re-branding — shared by studio and audience alike — that carries an element of creative folly. Animation, at its greatest, is already a glorious imitation of life. It’s not clear that audiences need an imitation of the imitation.

link film beauty and the beast 2017